Comments on: Conspiracy Theories 1

By: 7digitalSunday

7digitalSunday — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:20:05 +0000

Also Bush, Sr was …
Also Bush, Sr was head of CIA, the Bush family and bin laden family have had many business dealings, Most of the 19 terrorists were saudis, some had trained in US military bases.

By: Cryptopsy9666

Cryptopsy9666 — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:20:05 +0000

conciounse of Islam …
conciounse of Islam? … please, Muhammad is the messenger… and Allah is the one who leads us all… Whom he wills who are true believers. That is called Faith.

By: Merlin5x5

Merlin5x5 — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:20:05 +0000

The CIA NEVER …
The CIA NEVER sponsored Bin Laden in any form.
That’s the ignorance of this announcer, and typical hollywood logic.

The US sponsored NATIVE afghan peoples, most often from the northern tribes, and not the Pashtuns, the southern tribe that supported the Taliban, who supported Bin Laden.

Bin Laden was supported by the Taliban, and Pakistan intelligence, and was considered a FOREIGN Jihadist, as were his fighters.

Native Afghani never supported these groups.
.

By: bodunchar

bodunchar — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:20:05 +0000

armies cant defeat …
armies cant defeat a populace, armies can defeat another army. A populace is not an army and on that basis alone cannot be defeated.

By: Merlin5x5

Merlin5x5 — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:20:04 +0000

@zenoist2

…
@zenoist2

Actually, all those were to ask you to explain what YOU believed in, so I could make fun of your alternative theory.

The NIST and official version of 9/11 exist because they are the MOST reasonable sequence of events to explain the results.

IF you had a reasonable alternative, you would give it, but since your alternative involves imaginary forces, people, conspiratorial groups, and BAD physics, you don’t even SAY what your alternative is.

Idiots do that sort of thing

By: TanukiTensai

TanukiTensai — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:20:04 +0000

Anyone notice the …
Anyone notice the uploader’s name is
Ass-stubble(beard) in Japanese…wow

By: zenoist2

zenoist2 — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:20:04 +0000

I never even …
I never even mentioned a single one of them sorry to say Merlin.
Go through my posts if you want to waste time and find a SINGLE one that mentions no plane, global hawk, right and left zigzagging ,predator.
Im happy you are showing us all your high standard of research.
Nearly all my comments have been about physics, a subject you obviously know nothing about or don’t want to look at if it contradicts your pet beliefs.

By: Merlin5x5

Merlin5x5 — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:20:04 +0000

@zenoist2

Yes, …
@zenoist2

Yes, zenoist, you are a nutcase.

Why not explain how your “No planes” works, or your right and left zigzagging missile at the pentagon works, or tell us how a global hawk could do this, or a Predator.

The problem with just at the official story, is that you have to build a better job at explaining it, and you haven’t.

Oh, and I read the Truther “100 questions” in 2006, when they were made, and again in 2007, when NIST replied.

Before I ever saw you.
.

By: LtFang299

LtFang299 — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:20:04 +0000

@bodunchar

…
@bodunchar

Theoretically but in practice, no.

By: LtFang299

LtFang299 — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:20:04 +0000

@Merlin5x5 And CIA …
@Merlin5x5 And CIA supported them because they were fighting Russians in Afganistan. Part of Truman doctrine and why we’re called imperialists is because of that. So otherwise, alot of wars we’d backed out of could’ve been won. But in reality we won most of them based on body count of enemy forces.