9/11 Science vs. Conspiracy Theories Part 1 of 2
Debunking the lies of 9/11:
9/11 Science Report Appendix B WTC fire temperature discussion:
http://www.gallerize.com/9-11/911_Science_Report_App_B.pdf
http://911review.com/coverup/nist.html
http://forums.liveleak.com/showthread.php?p=281976
The Top Ten Connections Between
NIST and Nano-Thermites:
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/nist_thermite_connection.html
Analysis of Physics of WTC collapse:
http://www.saunalahti.fi/wtc2001/energia3.htm
John Gross video of NIST caught lying:
Richard Gage (Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth) going over the facts:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9qEIlNVl5s
http://www.AE911Truth.org
A complete 9/11 Timeline:
http://www.HistoryCommons.org
A complete listing of ALL officially sourced news articles which show evidence of a conspiracy:
http://911ArticlesOnline.com
Do your research!
Duration : 0:9:57
This isn’t about …
This isn’t about party or Bush Bashing. Its about our country:
You owe it to your country to look into both sides of the 9/11 debate. There are many verifiable facts and evidence. Good places to start
911 Connect the Dots is a great 18 min video @ watch?v=HfmliaqIRBE
Zero (by a Nobel Prize Winner) @ watch?v=ofXKiXNDDYA
WTC7 Freefall – No Longer Controversial. Scientifically Proven and self verifiable. @
watch?v=rP9Qp5QWRMQ
Science and Physics – 911 truth @ watch?v=K2Mor7udxJI&
i am a strucual …
i am a strucual engenieer and i know that it is impossible for one plane to bring down the tower this was CD , someone inside the building set it up but i dont think it was the government i think it could be maybe someone in association with terorists because if this was set up by the government they wouldnt be so stupid to make it impossible unless they thought we would be so sad at all the deaths we wouldnt question it.
Hijackers Passport …
Hijackers Passport found at Ground Zero Evidence – However no black boxes were found!:
US Courts Source: Hijacker passport photos – No burn marks! Gov Source @ tinyurl(dot)com/yf6o6fm
Also search for this in the 911 commission report: “Suqami’s passport survived the attack: a passerby picked it up from the World Trade Center and handed to a New York Police Department detective shortly before the towers collapsed.”
Government Source @ tinyurl(dot)com/yk7aau7
Watch: watch?v=ofXKiXNDDYA !!!
41 U.S. …
41 U.S. Counter-Terrorism and Intelligence Agency Veterans Challenge the Official Account of 9/11: “Terribly Flawed,” “Laced with Contradictions,” “a Joke,” “a Cover-up”
patriotsquestion911.(com) – Remove ()s to view link.
200+ Senior Military, Intelligence Service, Law Enforcement, and Government Officials
1000+ Engineers and Architects
250+ Pilots and Aviation Professionals
a) Zero (by a Nobel Prize Winner) @ watch?v=ofXKiXNDDYA
b) Science and Physics – 911 Truth @ watch?v=K2Mor7udxJI&
You owe it to your …
You owe it to your country to look into both sides of the 9/11 debate. There are many well researched videos, aside from the poorly done ones that turn people off like Loose change. Here are good places to start
911 Connect the Dots is a great 18 min video @ watch?v=HfmliaqIRBE
Zero (by a Nobel Prize Winner) @ watch?v=ofXKiXNDDYA
WTC7 Freefall – No Longer Controversial. Scientifically Proven and self verifiable. @
watch?v=rP9Qp5QWRMQ
Science and Physics – 911 truth @ watch?v=K2Mor7udxJI&
WTC 7 Collapsed …
WTC 7 Collapsed because of Web Truss system failure.
-Ask ANY fireman he’ll tell you Osama Bin Laden
@MvonRichthofen1918 …
@MvonRichthofen1918 ok pal i got video of the shanksville mayor saying there was no plane no nothing just a hole in the ground,and further more have you ever seen a plane crash where there wasn’t any wing sections -n- engine parts??? there is alway’s parts except for 9/11 only two planes can be seen that there isproof that planes where there wtc1 wtc 2 no plane at the pentagon no plane at shanksville you dumb fuck
@edgell911 look at …
@edgell911 look at the pictures, you daft twit. they aren’t just bomb craters. there’s and bits of charred plane wreckage strewn about in the ‘crater’, and quite a lot of it.
same with the pentagon.
1) Can any of the …
1) Can any of the debunkers please explain the mechanism in which the lower floors of WTC 7 were removed in fractions of a second prior to the upper floors hitting resistance? Especially when all of the potential energy of the building was already turned into kinetic energy to achieve the free fall acceleration admitted by NIST. Thus, leaving no energy from the falling building to cause any damage to the building below, which again did not provide any resistance as the building fell at free-fall
2) In order to back …
2) In order to back up the official story of the WTC7 collapse:
Debunkers would have to explain how a collapse that required compression between floors and thus resistance could take place in free-fall acceleration.
If debunkers want to have any grounds to stand on, in critiquing those who challenge the official story.
They need to show that the official story itself is SOUND, in order to debunk those who question it.
Debunkers skip this step on the questions they cannot answer.
3) There is only …
3) There is only one way to destroy the lower resistance while at the same time achieving free-fall without the energy from the falling building. This is to remove the floors just holding up the building in fractions of seconds with controlled demolition. There is no other way.
WTC7 Freefall – No Longer Controversial. Scientifically proven and self verifiable.
watch?v=rP9Qp5QWRMQ
WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall
(Part 1)
watch?v=V0GHVEKrhng
(2)
watch?v=XtKLtUiww80
(3)
watch?v=Vz43hcKYBm4
@cut3wood,
Which …
@cut3wood,
Which is why we need a FULL SCALE complete investigation into 9/11 with subpoena power.
I want Bush and Cheney to testify on camera, under oath.
ok pal i got video …
ok pal i got video of the shanksville mayor saying there was no plane no nothing just a hole in the ground,and further more have you ever seen a plane crash where there wasn’t any wing sections -n- engine parts??? there is alway’s parts except for 9/11 only two planes can be seen that there isproof that planes where there wtc1 wtc 2 no plane at the pentagon no plane at shanksville you dumb fuck
oh yes, and poor, …
oh yes, and poor, innocent japan was just minding its own business, not hurting anybody.
come on, even the architects of the pearl harbor attack thought it was a idea.
planes can explode, …
planes can explode, dumbfuck.
please do not …
please do not mention the NIST report:insults simple hight school physics with a shameless budget.watch here on YT:WTC 7 IN FREE FALL-NO LONGER CONTROVERSIAL.NIST reported what they were told to report:cover-up.
evidence???? mmmmmm …
evidence???? mmmmmm……two planes dissappeard into thin air on 9/11 come on lets get real now…I may be some dumb but i aint plum dumb…shanksville p.a mayor stated and I got the video to prove this that when he arrived at the crash site there was and i repeat..there was no plane nothing but a hole..so no bodies no plane just a hole so u take that were you take it…as for the pentagon no plane found just a small hole from the front to the back….how is that possible????
but the thermogram …
but the thermogram did not show thermite burnning. Cant have it both ways. If there was thermite there would of had to been a huge amount to cut the beams. I did my omw clocking of the towers falling and i came up with 14 seconds or so. Go back and double check your messurements please and make another report. Not trying to argue, your report is good but i have heard conflicting reports.
@Eldeecue on page …
@Eldeecue on page 320 of NCSTAR 1-5A, figures 9-22 and 9-23, NIST presents and discusses the images taken with FLIR.
They were, in fact, used in the government report.
Japan attacked …
Japan attacked after the allies isolated them They provoked them. How about gulf of tonkin or lithsutania?. They have a track record of this,cmon man
@Eldee
I guess you …
@Eldee
I guess you have a poor sense of comprehension when researching things?
The paint tests also verify the temperatures – the flirs were just an extra level of evidence. It is circumstantial alone – however you can also watch the footage of people in the holes of impacts in the WTC’s who are waving for help 15 minutes after impact. It couldn’t have been any hotter than 200 degrees F° at the location of impact then. Do you believe humans can live in fire over 200-250°?
watch?v=uxLz1v_hfaQ
But NIST says …
But NIST says ultimately it was fires caused the structural failure.
“debunkers” or whatever are never on the same page, at least a majority 9/11 truthers stick with the same story, and don’t change it around everytime a new argument is presented to them.
3 QUESTIONS 911 …
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON’T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Since Larry Silverstein said “pull it”, demolishing WTC 7 and collecting billions in insurance, why dld the insurance company pay the claim if there’s evidence of fraud?
Why did Dr. Steven Jones circumvent the peer review process by not showing his nanothermite paper to the chief editor and printing it without her approval?
How can Marvin Bush be in charge of WTC security when he stopped working for Securecom in the summer of 2000?
So you base this on …
So you base this on 2 blurry flir photos? This is really just as bad as using it to detect ghosts; you’re using a piece of equipment for a purpose entirely out of the realm of the tasks it was designed. The thing has calibration times,and numerous faults. They weren’t used in the government’s report because FLIR photography is infamous for it’s unreliability. I’m sorry, but you base this silly house of cards on an incredibly invalid base. “Doesn’t tell us their exact temp” Grats
You owe it to your …
You owe it to your country to look into both sides of the 9/11 debate. There are many well researched videos, aside from the poorly done ones that turn people off like Loose change. Here are good places to start
911 connect the dots is a great video @ watch?v=HfmliaqIRBE
And Zero (by a Nobel Prize Winner) @ watch?v=ofXKiXNDDYA
WTC7 Freefall – No Longer Controversial. Scientifically Proven and self verifiable. @
watch?v=gC44L0-2zL8
Architects and Engineers for 911 truth @ watch?v=K2Mor7udxJI&